§ Who We Serve - C-PACE Administrators

C-PACE program files with evidence discipline.

C-PACE administration is a paper trail with capital attached: property facts, eligible measures, savings evidence, lender consent, assessment records, closing conditions, and public-program accountability.

Program administration

A controlled record from project intake to assessment.

CORE can organize project documents, required forms, property and entity records, program rules, lender consent, review actions, and assessment evidence so administrators can answer what changed, who accepted it, and why.

Project evidence, requirements, and review status in one file

§ Program Evidence

C-PACE breaks when the record gets scattered.

01

Project facts need proof

Property, owner, improvement scope, use of proceeds, and eligible-measure facts should resolve to submitted evidence.

02

Consent drives timing

Mortgage-lender consent, title, closing, and assessment steps need status control instead of inbox memory.

03

Savings evidence matters

Energy, water, resiliency, contractor, and engineering support should stay attached to the project record.

04

Rules change by program

Local program requirements, templates, approvals, and review gates can be configured without hardcoding one jurisdiction's flow.

05

Capital stack context helps

Administrators can keep lender, sponsor, contractor, project, and closing-party evidence connected around one file.

06

Public accountability needs replay

A durable event trail helps explain what was reviewed, what changed, and who approved the record.

§ Fit

C-PACE workflows CORE can support

This is a strong adjacent fit when the administrator needs a controlled evidence file more than a generic CRM.

01

Project intake, required document tracking, and stage release

02

Property, owner, sponsor, contractor, and capital stack evidence

03

Eligible-measure, savings, engineering, and resiliency documentation

04

Mortgage-lender consent, title, closing condition, and assessment file control

05

Program rule citations, review decisions, and event-level audit history

§ Path

Evaluation path

01

Map the program checklist

Convert required evidence, consent steps, review gates, and closing conditions into workstreams.

02

Run a sample project

Validate document intake, source facts, rule citations, and review history on one file.

03

Test the handoff

Review how the record moves from intake to approval, assessment, closing, and later questions.

04

Decide the scope

Expand only where CORE clearly improves the administrative evidence record.

§ Next Step

Bring a C-PACE project file with consent or eligibility friction.

We will pressure-test whether CORE belongs as the program workspace, the evidence layer, or not at all.