§ Platform

Six products. One borrower file.

Most teams begin with CORE Workflow or CORE Underwriting, then add products upstream or downstream without rebuilding the borrower record.

Lifecycle map

The same file moves through every product.

Find the borrower, manage the file, underwrite the deal, configure the program-specific work, close with control, and service the portfolio without rebuilding context.

Find -> Manage -> Underwrite -> Configure -> Close -> Service

§ Progressive adoption

Start with today's bottleneck. Add products as the operation is ready.

01

Where most teams begin

CORE Workflow organizes the borrower file. CORE Underwriting turns reviewed evidence into credit judgment. Either can be the first deployment.

02

Find the next borrower

Add CORE Lead Discovery when origination needs human-screened, program-fit opportunities feeding the same pipeline.

03

Configure program assistance

Add CORE Programs once the credit box, memo templates, evidence rules, and AI support are ready for governed rollout.

04

Continue after approval

Add CORE Closing and CORE Servicing when the approved file needs to move through funding and portfolio management without losing its decision history.

§ Engine layer

Program Studio is why six products do not become six builds.

CORE Underwriting configures the credit box. CORE Programs adds program-specific memo templates, evidence rules, and AI support under human review.

Configured by Program Studio

A loan program is a configuration, not a build.

The document package, credit box, policy library, and memo template remain visible, versioned configuration layers across the borrower-file lifecycle.

WorkflowLoan Programs + Collection Packages
UnderwritingUnderwriting Policies + COREView
ProgramsMemo Templates + human-in-the-loop agents
View Program Studio

§ Inside the platform

Specialized capabilities stay connected across the borrower file.

Document intelligence, spreading, COREView, AI governance, and examiner defense connect source evidence to analysis, decisions, and replay across the borrower file.

§ Architecture · Workflows

One project. Many workflows. One audit trail.

A project can carry multiple program-scoped financing workflows. Each workflow can follow a different loan program, stage plan, and status history while sharing one borrower file and connected audit trail.

§ project structure·coordinated workflows
PROJECTMaplewood Apartments·124-unit affordable multifamily·Atlanta GA·$42.0M total
  • ├──Bridge$34.0Minterimapplication → underwriting → drawn → repaid at HUD close
  • ├──HUD 221(d)(4)$34.0Mpermapplication → MAP review → firm commitment → closed
  • └──C-PACE$4.5Mpermproject → engineer → lender consent → recorded
3 workflows·1 project·sequenced bridge-to-perm·1 connected audit trail

Disconnected setup: 3 loan records with 3 disconnected workflows.

CORE: one project view, workflow-level history, and a connected audit trail — the bridge close feeds the HUD take-out.

§ Connected operations · One controlled record

The operating work stays with the credit record.

Origination, borrower-file operations, closing, and servicing stay connected to the same project context, permissions, evidence, and decision history.

01

Origination workspace

CRM relationships, pipeline stages, contacts, tags, and activity stay connected to the borrower opportunity and project.

02

Borrower-file operations

Email, project communications, tasks, forms, collection, and data-room access remain attached to the same controlled record.

03

Post-approval operations

CORE Closing and CORE Servicing carry the decision into funding, boarding, obligations, annual reviews, action packages, and sandbox payment controls.

From the first relationship through servicing, each action stays connected to the borrower file and its decision history.

§ Next Step

See the platform on a real borrower file.

Follow one file from intake through servicing and see how the evidence, decisions, and controls stay connected.